INIA » Solutions and Asylum Procedures

Solutions and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are now reviving these kinds of systems. From lie detection tools tested at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being found in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to navigate these devices and to go after their legal right for safety.

It also displays how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from being able to view the channels of cover. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/ mechanisms of such technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who have are disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: while they assistance to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.